Organic SEO Services by Jan Hvizdak

I gave up development of the Cross-Linker plugin for WordPress as well as the Captcha Godfather plugin for WordPress because people are experiencing problems with compatibility. Well... I created these plugins, tested them, but I am not responsible for others' plugins nor for further development of WordPress. In fact, I hate WordPress and soon I will be upgrading this website and WordPress will be removed. Just one experience to show why I deeply hate WordPress: I've been commenting on blogs, but now I cannot. I cannot because about 50% of blogs return blank screen after submitting a comment. I don't know who fucked things up, but I know that without WordPress the world would be a better place. WordPress gave plenty of people a chance to blog. WordPress is also used for spamming purposes, is spammed and doesn't bring any additional value to the world. Plenty of crap blogs, unbelievable stories about how easy it's to make money blogging and such bullshits... WordPress is crap and am not going to use it any longer. It's the same story like with Windows OS. I had to remove it from my computer because it was fucking things as much as possible. I am a happy user of Linux for years now; No more Windows, no more WordPress. Consider quitting WordPress too. I am a coder so it's fucking easy for me to develop a core of my own blog, but even a "me not coder" can create some simple website which will replace WordPress shit. Oh, by the way... WordPress is very bad in terms of SEO. If you decide to donate, you're just saying thanks. All about donations and such things will be removed or modified as soon as I find some time to make some peace from the garbage left by WordPress.


Currently I am writing for blog at web-developers.net where I explain more about SEO, internet business, links and so on. Read why I am writing there. If you are using the Cross-Linker plugin for WordPress and if you want me to solve anything, then consider making a donation ($122 received until now; updated manually):

September 12, 2007

Dedicated servers – advantages and disadvantages

Filed under: — admin @ 5:20 pm

Special note: This article isn’t written by Jan Hvizdak, the services-seo.net founder, and is only translated from Slovak to English language. It’s goal is informational only. You may redistribute this article „as is“ only if you provide a link back in the references list. This document was written by student(s) and was tested in order to pass the copyright test.

In this article, I’d like to intorduce you dedicated servers, their advantages and disadvantages of such solution for your web site. Nowdays, there are two basic terms in the world of web hosting companies; ‘Virtual server’ and ‘Dedicated server’. Let’s analyse differences between them too.

What is a virtual and dedicated web hosting service?

Virtual web hosting means that your web site is stored on some computer (also called as web server) besides other web sites; There may be for example 10, 20, 100, 500 of such sites or even more. This solution’s disadvantage is limited speed of both, internet conection and processor, less safety and the major problem is that you’re not able to install/uninstall or upgrade various packages and modules. The only one advantage of this service is it’s cost availability.

If your web site is located on a dedicated server, then the whole machine is yours. Thus you get more speed, safety and you control everything. If you buy such service, you should be able to install or uninstall various modules, including new PHP engine or MySQL database. You’re simply allowed to upgrade it the way you need it. This kind of web hosting is required by large web sites with lots of databases, millions of visitors each day, use a lot of system resources. If you keep sensitive data within your databases, you should consider dedicated web hosting too, so no-one will be able to share your data. Unfortunately, this service is much more expensive than virtual web hosting and usually costs at least $400 per month.

The list of advantages and disadvantages of dedicated servers

You’re in need of a dedicated web hosting service if:

  • 1) Your web site has as many inputs as a virtual server can’t handle in a real time,
  • 2) You need to install a lot of webpages on a server,
  • 3) You require a service or module which virtual servers don’t offer,
  • 4) You require a high security level.

All advantages can be grouped into following:

  • 1) Very low security risk,
  • 2) System resources are fully available for your applications only,
  • 3) Possibility of modifying system variables,
  • 4) Special care of your server,
  • 5) Processor, memory, HDD performance used by your site only,
  • 6) Usually unlimited amount of transferred data,
  • 7) Your own IP (internet protocol) address,
  • 8) Uninstalling and installing required modules on demand,
  • 9) Web hosting firm is usually responsible for all hardware components.

Providing a dedicated server should be an outstanding service

Rental of a dedicated web server is usually followed by a set of requirements like high performance, speed, safe run, no breakdowns and comfort. This service offers focusing on business more than potential server’s problems and maintenance.

As web business spreads, operating very important and difficult online applications gets it’s importance in every country. Old and new companies still tend to offer new services which require more system resources than an ordinary virtual hosting might offer. Even if internet companies in countries like USA, Great Britain, France or Australia offer dedicated web hosting for long years, other countries use to offer it too.

As time goes by, web products and solutions are getting more sophisticated and they require more speed than a virtual server offers. Nowdays, classical servers can’t handle complex, expensive, and integrated intranet and internet applications as real-time operations if serving more than 1 of them at one moment.

Example of a dedicated server:

ASUS RS120-E3

Specification:

  • CPU Intel® P4 Prescott 630 3.0 Ghz
  • RAM 512 MB DDR2 533
  • HDD 2x 80 GB S-ATA-II RAID1
  • 2x newtork card Broadcom® BCM5721 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
  • ATI® RAGE-XL /8MB Graphic cars
  • CD-ROM
  • 4x USB port
  • 1x Serial port
  • 1x 64bit / 100MHz PCI-X
  • 1x PCI-E x8
  • 1x miniPCI
  • 2x PS/2 (keyboard and mouse)
  • 1x 400W source

Connectivity:

Usually at least 10 Mbps. It is about 100 Mbps, however in the case of overloaded network it’s only 10 Mbps. Of course, it’s possible to raise the connection speed. On the other hand, it costs more. In my experience, such speed is enough if you’re getting up to 1 000 000 visitors each day.

Very important point is a restart possibility. You should be able to restart the server via cell phone call, SMS or via any other way on demand immediatelly. You should be able to access the server anytime too.

Another configuration:

Fujitsu Siemens RX100S3

  • Intel® Pentium® 4, 800 MHz FSB, 630 3.0 Ghz
  • RAM 512 MB up to 8 GB, unbuffered ECC DDR2-533 SDRAM, PC2-4200
  • CD/DVD or CD/DVD-RW
  • HDD 2x 80 / 160 / 250 GB SATA, easy change or hot-plug
  • 2x ports SATA 300 with RAID 0,1
  • 2x 100 / 100 / 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN
  • ATI Rage XL 8 MB graphic card

Fujitsu Siemens RX200S2

  • 1 or 2 processors 64-bit Intel Xeon™; 800 Mhz FSB; 2.8 up to 3.8 Ghz
  • RAM 1 GB up to 16 GB, ECC DDR2-400 (PC2-3200) SDRAM
  • CD/DVD or CD/DVD-RW
  • HDD 2x 35 / 73 / 146 / 300 GB Ultra320 SCSI, hot-plug
  • 1x Ultra30 SCSI controller with RAID 1
  • 2x 10 / 100 / 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN
  • ATI Rage XL 8 MB graphic card

Fujitsu Siemens RX300S2

  • 1 or 2 processors 64-bit Intel Xeon™; 800 Mhz FSB; 2.8 up to 3.8 Ghz
  • Single-Core or 2.8 Ghz Dual-Core Intel® Xeon™
  • RAM 1 GB up to 16 GB, ECC DDR2-400 (PC2-3200) SDRAM
  • CD/DVD or CD/DVD-RW
  • HDD 6x 35 / 73 / 146 / 300 GB Ultra320 SCSI, hot-plug
  • 2 channel Ultra30 SCSI controller with RAID 1, RAID on mother board level 0, 1, 10, 5, 50
  • 2x 10 / 100 / 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN
  • ATI Rage XL 8 MB graphic card

Bear in mind, that you should back-up your data on a regular basis.

This article was published on 12/13/2006 (mm-dd-yyyy).

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress

This blog uses the cross-linker plug-in developed by Web-Developers.Net